According to
Islam Watch Hizb ut-Tahrir (the Party of Liberation) is banned in virtually all Arab nations in the Middle East, such as Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and the pre-revolution Egypt. It is banned in Tunisia and pre-revolution Libya, and also Turkey. It is regarded as such a threat that it is even banned in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, which are already cauldrons of extremism. It is banned in all the former Soviet states in Central Asia, and since February 2003 it has been banned in Russia. It has been banned in Germany - on account of its anti-Semitism and its desire to use force for political ends – since March 2003, and it is also banned in the Netherlands. Recently also banned in Bangladesh.
Yet in the United States the group remains free to operate.
Hizb ut-Tahrir is a conveyor belt for terrorism operating openly in the U.S., so why haven't we outlawed this organization like other countries have done? Worse than that, we have politicians and bureaucratic boot lickers LYING to us on national television that organizations like this, or the Muslim Brotherhood, are non-violent political organizations. The Wayback retrospective search engine confirms historical connection of Hizb ut Tahrir and their links to Al Qaeda preceding 911, as well as some appalling anti Semitic comments as recent as 2003.
It is well documented that the Muslim Brotherhood in 1948 was the group that assassinated the Egyptian prime minister; and group members fought in the 1948 war against Zionist forces in mandate Palestine.
Hizb ut Tahrir and the
Muslim Brotherhood Should Be Banned in the United States of America!
Hizb ut-Tahrir as defined by
Wikipedia
Muslim Brotherhood as defined by
Wikipedia
Hizb ut-Tahrir is seeking a global government through
Caliphate including here in the U.S.
Are you ready to be under
Sharia Law?
Organization of Islamic Cooperation, who just changed its name in June of 2011 from the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, could be the basis of the new Caliphate, an attempt to replace Judeo-Christian Governments around the world, including a recent conference in Chicago where they outright stated that it was their goal to include the United States in this global change in governance. The OIC has a permanent delegation to the United Nations, and describes itself as the second largest international organisation after the United Nations. President Obama has decided it would be a great idea to team up with the UN’s Organization of Islamic Cooperation in an effort to combat Islamophobia which may soon result in the delegitimization of freedom of expression as a human right. The international effort to do away with Islamophobia will be undertaken at the expense of United States taxpayers, of course.
Maggies Notebook and the
National Review have well researched and footnoted articles you might want to read about the cooperation between Obama and the OIC.
We have to be willing to stand and call a spade a spade. A wolf in sheep's clothing is still a wolf, and no matter how many name changes these organizations go through (like Acorn, which is alive an well under different names thanks to the Obama administration which is stonewalling efforts on two fronts to investigate the still-operating ACORN infamous for its thug tactics and election fraud) these leopards cannot change their spots. We need to repel the terror onto the "terrorists" themselves. Make those who thrive on spreading hatred and fear - especially those extremists who hide their true aims, like Hizb ut Tahrir or the Muslim Brotherhood – squirm and disperse. Draw the appropriate line in the sand NOW and be clear that if we get it wrong...those who succeed us in trying to clean up this mess will be working for decades and consumed by removing groups like Hizb ut Tahrir and the Muslim Brotherhood from the free world - and that would be an awful waste of human capital, of time and of our hard-fought freedoms.
Hello...knock, knock...Mr. Eric H. Holder, Jr. - Attorney General of the United States, are you there? Oh no, I forgot...you're meeting today with
Muslim Leaders in Portland. You say you're there to talk with Arab-American and Muslim leaders in Portland to discuss the department’s commitment to protecting the rights of the Muslim, Sikh, Arab-American, and South Asian communities? You mean rights granted by the Constitution or by Sharia Law? I'm confused. Aren't you charged to protect and defend our homeland, while upholding the promises of the Constitution, including respect for civil liberties, a commitment to religious freedom and honor for the diversity of the American people? So how does letting known terrorist organizations operate freely in the U.S. accomplish those objectives?
